What’s that blue thing doing here?
So your new Pi NoIR has plopped through the letterbox, and you’ve unpacked it. There’s a little square of blue gel in there. What’s it for?
If you’ve been reading our posts about why we developed an infrared camera board keenly, you’ll have noticed that we mentioned a lot of interest from botanists, who use infrared photography to work on the health of trees. We started to read up about the work, found it absolutely fascinating, and thought you’d like to get in on it too.
A short biology lesson follows.
Photosynthesis involves chlorophyll absorbing light and using the energy to drive a charge separation process which ultimately (via a vast range of hacked together bits and pieces – if you believe in intelligent design, you won’t after you’ve read the Wikipedia page on chlorophyll) generates oxygen and carbohydrate. Here’s a nice picture of the absorption spectrum of two sorts of chlorophyll, swiped from Wikipedia:
Notice that both kinds of chlorophyll absorb blue and red light, but not green or infrared.
So: why are trees green? The graph above shows you that it’s because green is what’s left once the chlorophyll has grabbed all the long wavelength (red) and short wavelength (blue) light.
Let’s say you’re a biologist, and you want to measure how much photosynthesis is going on. One way to do this would be to look for greenness, but it turns out an even better method is to look for infrared and not blue – this is what the filter lets us do. Bright areas in a picture filtered like this mean that lots of photosynthesis is happening in those spots.
There’s a long history of doing this stuff from space (the Landsat vehicles, for example, look at the Earth across a very broad spectrum), and Public Lab have done loads of research as part of their Infragram project (and associated Kickstarter) to find ways of modifying cameras, and to find cheap alternatives to expensive optical bandgap filters. Our friend Roscolux #2007 Storaro Blue (that’s the blue thing’s full name) turns out to be a great example – we buy it on giant reels and the guys at the factory in Wales where we make the Raspberry Pi and both kinds of camera board cut it up into little squares for you to use. It’s not very expensive at all for us to provide you with a little square of blue, and it adds a lot of extra functionality to the camera that we hope you’ll enjoy playing with.
The work of the folk at Public Lab has been absolutely vital in helping us understand all this, and we’re very grateful to them for their work on finding suitable filters at low prices, and especially on image processing. We strongly recommend that you visit Public Lab’s Infragram to process your own images. We’re talking to Public Lab at the moment about working together on developing some educational activities around Pi NoIR. We’ll let you know what we come up with right here.
We sent Matthew Lippincott from Public Lab an early Pi NoIR (and a blue thing), and he sent it up on a quadcopter to take some shots of the tree canopy, which he’s processed using Infragram, to show you what’s possible.
We still have some to do in getting images taken with the filter absolutely perfect (notably in white balance calibration), but we hope that what you can do with the filter already gives you a feel for the potential of an infrared camera. In a way, it’s a shame we’re launching this in the autumn: there’s less photosynthesising going on out there that there might be. But you’ll still get some really interesting results if you go outside today and start snapping.
What incredible images!
It’s spring in Southern Hemisphere :)
…and we look forward to seeing what folks in Oz and NZ get up to as buds start to bud!
And a *bunch* of other leafy places south of the equator, too!
Well, you do realize that the “Cali” in “California” means “warm” in Español, correcto? We may be fat, dumb, and lazy out here, but we know enough to come in from the cold by avoiding it altogether! :lol: Our condolences to our friends elsewhere in the hemisphere tilting away from the Sun at the moment, although anyone South of about 35 ~ 40 degrees North latitude should be able to provide plenty of active foliage-growth shots with the Pi NoIR, too.
Alex Eames (RasPi.TV)
Excellent. Will have to have a play with that. Still got some leaves left round here.
IR leds on the way too, to try out some night vision experiments.
This is exactly what im doing too.. The NoIR camera and a bunch of IR LEDs :-)
Alex Eames (RasPi.TV)
I just did a sneaky rehearsal using one of my IP cams as an IR source. Worked quite well indoors. Not done range check yet though :)
I look forward to seeing the numberplate of your neighbour’s hatchback illuminated by IR ;-)
“(via a vast range of hacked together bits and pieces – if you believe in intelligent design, you won’t after you’ve read the Wikipedia page on chlorophyll)”
I dunno, you should see some of the code I’ve hacked together in the past, and I’m supposedly intelligent! :)
Dang it, after reading the post, I came to the site to write relatively the same thing!
Thirded. I think photosynthesis is a really elegant piece of work – reminiscent of the fabled Story of Mel, but on another level.
If it’s that frickin cool then why don’t humans have it? Then we could all just walk round in the sun getting energied up and no one in Africa etc would starve.
And why have goddamn mantis shrimp got better eyes than us?! It makes me crazy to see those rubbish little decapods running around seeing way into the spectrum with 3D vision even from one eye when we have to make do with some delicate flabby sac of floater-filled fluid, blind spot, no night vision, half of the population wearing spectacles, poor peripheral vision, laughable acuity, inefficient receptors etc etc. Any engineer coming up with that ‘intelligent design’ when asked to design some visual apparatus would be sacked. And laughed at.
… and immediately promoted into management, then the executive ranks, and finally crowned CEO if they have a full head of just the right shade of silvery hair … :lol:
Hey I never said the human body was perfect, heck I live in the thing! Though I think the mantis shrimp’s 10,000 pixels would be a deal-breaker for me. :o)
My friends Jemma did a series of IR photographs, and they always look beautiful for themselves, even without the scientific applications :-)
“Failed to insert addon: _defensio/admin_defensio.php” ?? :-S
Mysteeeeeeeeeeerious whispers! Mysteeeeeeeeeeerious whispers!
♫ I walk along darkened corridors! ♫
Excellent article and showcase for the new camera.
I don’t know whether I’m more amazed by that or the TMBG reference, though…
Thanks for both :-)
I am just as amazed at the TMBG reference, that i felt compelled to remark, too.
Gotta love those silly Johns.
I heard a sound, I turned around, I turned around to find the think that made the sound.
Wow that ‘copter shot looks very un-tree-like…
Indeed, I though their were some kind of strange photos of bacteria or fungi. Then I read the article. Took me a little more effort to recognize the trees.
Emma’s first reaction was that they looked like highly magnified pollen grains or a fungal growth. (Every team should have a biologist on board.)
I love it when you get to see a different take on something you’re normally so familiar with :)
You can thank the magic of fractals guiding chemistry and physics for the similarities, where everything small looks big, and everything big looks small! ;)
Not highly Pi-relevant, but, Liz, I didn’t want you to think that no one had appreciated your TMBG reference…
Are you the guy who hit me in the eye?
Great explanation. Maybe this will explain why my brush is prematurely red while everything else is still green. Not that there’s much left this time of year. Looking forward to it!
One of my photographic interests is taking infrared pictures of trees and general landscapes. In the early 2000s I used a Minolta Dimage 5 digital camera with an Ilford SFX200 filter to capture near-infrared images, and got pictures similar to those above. The Minolta was good for shooting evaluation images before committing relatively expensive frames of 120 film.
I’m seriously considering a Pi NoIR as an Xmas treat!
Wow, and I thought I was the only one who ponied up and bought the Minolta DiMage 5! Nice!
It’s 35 degrees C here in Perth Western Australia today, there’s plenty of photo photosynthesising going on!
Is newark.com (element14) ever going to get noir in stock for usa customers?
Its scratched already!
Hullo. Heavily colour-blind person here again. Can someone explain how these photos differ from regular tree photos?
I understand what they technically/scientifically/biologically represent, but can someone “audio describe” the images for me (and my fellow Pi colourblindeee Raspberry Pi Guy) please?
As I understand it, tree branches are brown and leaves are usually a variant of green. What do these images show that is different, please?
Thinking about this a bit more – one of the colour blindness problems I have whilst gardening is working out which plants are healthy and which plants are unhealthy. I can spot which ones are dehydrated, and those which are withered, but I’m told by others that colour-sighted people can tell signs of ill plant health by the colour of the leaves. Apparently colour-sighted gardeners can then either remove the ill plants, or give them extra water, nutrients and specialised foods to help them along.
If the NoIR + filter enables me to detect high vs. low photosynthesis, would this enable me to tell healthy vs. unhealthy plants? Can the images be converted into monochrome, or even subject to numerical analysis, in order to provide that information to me without use of colour?
They actually look a lot like monochrome (only with some more blues in the picture than you find with b/w). The areas which would appear green (healthy leaves) appear varying shades of grey/white: the brighter the white, the greener the leaves. When a plant is sick, the green leaves often start to turn colour towards red or yellow before withering. I can imagine that yes, it might help you detect which of your plants are healthy, especially if you use numerical analysis.
We were talking about your colour-blindness in the office when I was preparing this post, actually; and commiserating. I would not like to live in a world without green.
I already wrote a pixel-analysis routine in Python as part of a camera motion detector, so I might try re-using that code (and posting it up somewhere for others to play with).
My world isn’t entirely without green – I can tell Crayola crayons apart, if I take them outside in bright sunlight. However my world IS entirely without pink and purple, which many people assure me is no bad thing.
Rainbows are lovely, they have a beautiful binary simplicity; one wide yellow stripe, one wide blue stripe, and that’s it.
Autumn also has a binary simplicity; leaves are on, leaves are off.
A full-colour world must be very distracting. I’m amazed you lot ever get anything done.
Raspberry Pi Jam, Coventry, Sept 2013:
Teacher: Is your daughter the one dressed ENTIRELY in pink?
Me: I have no idea
[time passes. thorin sits down and sings about gold]
Me: Annabel, did you dress entirely in pink today?
Annabel: Yes, daddy
Me: As gender-stereotype-defying dad & daughter days out go, this is a somewhat mixed result.
What evidence can you possibly point to that we actually do get anything done? :lol:
The odd thing about the picture above (to my near-typical vision) is that is is extremely monochrome. Each individual tree is made up of one uniform shade, and a lot brighter than the background, whereas in a normal image I’d expect to see more of a mixture of both colours and shades over the plant. A closer look shows there are very few branches visible in the gaps – we’re only looking at the leaves and any algae, after all. I think that’s why it reminds me of an electronmicrograph – probably one from an STM, where we only see the outer surfaces of the subject.
To your second question, in my experience sick leaves almost always turn either yellow or brown, indicating a loss of chlorophyll, so that’s a yes. You could see the same effect by looking at the green channel – or better still, comparing the green and red channels – in a normal RGB image.
Thanks. So it’s predominantly a monochrome image, and the brightness of each pixel represents the [ potential for | amount of ]? photosynthesis.
Monochrome sounds great, easy to analyse; high numbers (brighter) mean healthier photosynthesis, low numbers (darker) mean less photosynthesis.
The Pi NoIR has the same color sensor as the Pi camera, so it makes a color image using the YUV color model. I don’t know what kind of color filter array it uses (Bayer or other), but I assume each pixel on the sensor is covered with a colored filter, and that there are three different colors, like RGB. With the Infrared block filter removed, each pixel still captures some red, green, or blue light as usual, but also captures some near infrared (NIR) light. So the photos look a little strange. If you put an infrared filter over the lens, like a Wratten 87 which blocks all visible light, each channel will capture only near infrared light. Viewed as a monochrome image, this would have information about plant health because healthy leaves reflect almost all near infrared light, and dead leaves or non-plants usually don’t. So the brightest pixels are likely to be healthy plants.
If you put the little blue filter (Rosco) over the lens (or behind it), then you can learn even more about plant health. The Rosco filter blocks most red light but passes the blue end of the spectrum and also near infrared light. The blue channel will now capture visible blue light as usual (plus some infrared) but there is no red light for the red channel to capture so it captures mostly near infrared light. Using these two channels you can compare the amount of blue and infrared light that is reflected from plants and other surfaces.
For 40 years, remote sensing scientists have used the difference between near infrared and visible light to create the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). This index uses reflected infrared light as a proxy for the amount of incoming sunlight, and uses reflected red (or blue) as an indication of how much visible light has been absorbed by the surface. Healthy plants absorb lots of blue and red light to power photosynthesis, so they show a big difference between infrared and visible. By doing math with the DNs in the blue and red (NIR) channels you can compute NDVI as NDVI=(NIR-blue)/(NIR+blue). The values will be between -1 and +1, with healthy plants between 0.2 and 0.8. The higher the NDVI value, the more photosynthesis is probably happening. I works pretty well, but each camera is different, and we have barely started to test the Pi NoIR.
The NDVI results can be greatly improved if a custom white balance can be done on the camera. So that feature is highly anticipated. There is some , and more information about .
I just got my Pi Noir this morning, hooked it up, and pointed it out the window. This thing is sweet and sharp!!! Pics to follow!!!
I must have missed earlier posts on the Pi NoIR, but is it still a color camera, or a monochrome camera? I.e., is there still an RGB Bayer filter over the sensor?
If it’s color, then there are still many applications for a monochrome camera… including IR. We can’t have everything, but I’m hoping it’s monochrome. :)
As far a I know, it’s the identical sensor to the standard Raspberry Pi camera, but with the IR filter element removed. This is basically an official version of the delicate please-do-not-try-this-at-home conversion of the existing camera to remove the IR filter.
Or rather, assembled without an IR filter to being with.
Thanks! I guess I’ll have to campaign for a monochrome (panchromatic) version too then. :)
Just reading our local newspaper with an article about a local lad’s success.
If you can search the results of that event for yourself, his name is Brett Roy.
He’s just returned from the International Chocolate Awards held in London on the 20th October with two Silver Medals.
One was in the “Flavoured Dark Ganaches and Truffles” division with his entry of Raspberry Noir
Oh dear*furrows brow*! Looks like another trip to the RPI store is in order. The problem is that I know “exactly” what I can do with that here in the South of France! Mmm technology, science, nature, eco-friendliness, all in one tasty package.
PS Where can you buy an on-board biologist? (re : Comment 6)
Will the NoIR be available as a bundle with Model A like the standard camera, it saves a lot of money. None of suppliers seem to have a NoIR bundle.
Thanks for the writeup! I wrote up my notes for scripting the Raspberry Pi to boot into timelapse mode.
Here’s the image processed in NGB (Near infrared, Blue, Green) and NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) through Infragram.org:
I might be interpreting this incorrectly. But is it saying that the NoIR camera is infrared enabled solely by that piece of blue and has nothing to do with the camera itself, which is same as other green standard Pi cameras?
Yeah best rely ever.
Comments are closed